Talk:Düsum Khyenpa, 1st Karmapa Lama

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Düsum Khyenpa, 1st Karmapa Lama article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tibet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Head of Kagyu?

Can someone knowledgeable clarify the relationship between the Karmapas, the Karma Kagyu lineage, and the Kagyu school as a whole? The Karmapas are sometimes described as the head of the Kagyu school, but I sometimes get the impression that, while they are the most recognizable Kagyu lamas, they are really only the boss of their own Karma Kagyu subset. - Nat Kraus e 16:05, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Necessity for carefully footnoting added material

This article has apparently so far been taken with permission from Ken Holmes' book Karmapa which is on a web site. It is most important, therefore, that any added material or changes are carefully referenced so that there can be no mistaking what came from Ken Holmes' book and what is new material. I will do this with some additions I will make - but just thought I should make this request now in case others wish to make changes or additions. Cheers, John Hill 07:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Katok Monastery by Rigpashedra

Austerlitz -- 88.75.94.28 (talk) 12:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Düsum Khyenpa, 1st Karmapa Lama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041205072856/http://www.personal.u-net.com/~samye/karmapa.htm to http://www.personal.u-net.com/~samye/karmapa.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Düsum Khyenpa, 1st Karmapa Lama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 November 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Again, this is on behalf of another user, I do not necessarily agree with the proposed titles. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I'm of the opinion that, if the title is incorrect and should be "Karmapa", we should treat it like we do a lot of other titles. What I mean by this is keeping 1st Karmapa, 2nd Karmapa, etc., at the end of the article title. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopaedia. Frankly, your personal opinions do not matter since reliable academic sources prevail. Metokpema (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unilaterally submitted this move request on behalf of @Metokpema without coordination after Metokpema submitted this issue to the Edit Warring Administrators. Metokpema is now completing this group move request properly by adding justification and source links in support of the moves. These moves follow two very simple points:

The Karmapa's title is 'Karmapa', and can be 'Gyalwang Karmapa', but is not 'Karmapa Lama' and has never been Karmapa Lama:

This elementary point is confirmed by the Karmapa himself at kagyuoffice.org, where their list of the 17 Karmapas do not have 'Lama' in their name. Their tulku title has never been 'Karmapa Lama', and why or when it was mistakenly used as their title on Wikipedia is not clear since no one has provided any evidentiary support for these incorrect titles.
Three other respected academic sites that have presences on the internet all support this point. They are treasuryoflives.org , whose biographical articles are peer reviewed; and lotsawahouse.org , whose team of translators are highly respected and their open access to buddhist texts is commendable; and bdrc.org , the Buddhist Digital Resource Center, whose library of texts authored by the Karmapas list them exclusively as karma pa (in the Wylie translation of Tibetan).
To assume wrongly that every tulku lineage has Lama in their title is rather shocking, especially in an encyclopedic setting.

The next very simple point is that the Tulku title naming convention for Tibetan Buddhists is tulku number, then spiritual title, then given name, as in the 8th Karmapa, Mikyo Dorje'.

Again, this Tulku naming convention is used by the above listed highly reliable sources, and by innumerable published academic journals and their qualified authors. Minor differences could include writing or spelling the tulku number (as in '8th Karmapa' or 'Eighth Karmapa') and these moves propose keeping the number system as in '8th Karmapa'.
Additionally, the Tibetan language version uses karma pa 08 where the number follows the tulku title, whereas the English translations prefer the number preceding the tulku title. These moves propose to keep the English version of number placement.

All of these links, and more links, and more examples and more points can be found at Talk:Theckchok Dorje, 14th Karmapa Lama, which is where this request for moves should have been posted.Metokpema (talk) 10:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be clear, I couldn't care less about your inaccurate edit warring report because, we I've described three times, it very clearly was not edit warring, but there's no need to rehash that. Submit it again if you like, I told you I'd start the move, and your edit warring report will be closed as not edit warring, plain and simple, because I reverted your moves once, and that was that. There was no back and forth, hence, no edit warring. Your personal attacks and repeated assumptions of bad faith are ridiculous.

Grow up. Don't post on my talk page again, and do not ping me again. Our interactions from here on out are over, unless you feel like submitting another frivolous report which will be closed without action (except maybe a WP:BOOMERANG based on your behaviour).

As mentioned, an uninvolved third party will close the discussion after 7 days. Let the process run its course, this is standard practice when a move has been contested. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How dare you

How dare you Hey man im josh ignore WP conventions and refuse to discuss your unsourced personal opinions which qualifies as edit warring; how dare you then unilaterally submit the move 'on my behalf' after edit warring; how dare you try to tank the move by failing to co-ordinate with me, failing to submit it properly , and not submitting it at Talk:Theckchok Dorje, 14th Karmapa Lama. Metokpema (talk) 10:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Christ... you're impossible. Your personal attacks and condescension are beyond the pale. I've worked hard to talk to you, but do not ping me again. I am done discussing this further with you. The move discussion has been started, an impartial third party will close the discussion after 7 days. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]