Talk:KOS-MOS

This article was nominated for deletion on February 7, 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was rough consensus for a merge and redirect.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KOS-MOS article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "KOS-MOS" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1

Video games: Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Comments/input

I figured I'd create a section for my thoughts and comments as I look over the article. Sergecross73 msg me 18:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile the name KOS-MOS, pronounced "cosmos"
- I could be wrong, but I don't recall this being accurate. I'm bad at conveying pronunciations, but I think of "cosmos" being pronounced "Kahz-mose", whereas, I thought I recalled "KOS-MOS" being pronounced more like "Kose-mose". The pronunciation didn't seem to be in the source given either. The rest of the sentence was good and sourced, but I think the part above needs to be reworked or dropped. Sergecross73 msg me 18:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Reception section should be rearranged so that they scholarly, detailed sources, are mentioned more upfront in the section. I think its more important, and honestly I think it'll help dissuade people from wanting to re-merge it again. The non-scholarly stuff is fine...but its also a lot of the stuff that editors use to try to pad out non-notable character article. Just a thought. Sergecross73 msg me 19:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]