User talk:Espenrh
- Yo. Espen. Calling it the "Nobel Prize For Economics" is wrong. From Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary:
- Main Entry: er·ro·ne·ous\\
- Pronunciation: i-'rO-nE-&s, e-'rO-\\
- Function: adjective\\
- Etymology: Middle English, from Latin erroneus, from erron-, erro wanderer, from errare\\
- 1 : containing or characterized by error : MISTAKEN <erroneous assumptions>\\
- 2 archaic : WANDERING\\
- - er·ro·ne·ous·ly adverb\\
- - er·ro·ne·ous·ness noun\\
- Perhaps there is an agenda in not pointing out this error, but it is important.
Why are you quoting this dictionary entry? This posting doesn't make any sense at all.
The point is that even though it migh be more precise to refer to the prize by its full and formal name it's not erroneous to simply refer to it as the Nobel prize in economics.
If you'd like to continue this discussion the least thing you could do is to register as user.
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Espenrh! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- John Sutton (economist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Péter Molnár - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Gennady Grushevoy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Paulos Tesfagiorgis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced BLP
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 21:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)